ag百家乐稳赢打法 管制学海外博士（DBA）答辩系列 | 祝福Janet ZHANG同学顺利通过博士论文答辩
2025年2月24日，SJTU-SMU DBA 2020级Janet ZHANG同学在交大安泰迎来了她论文的答辩时间。SJTU导师欧阳璨扶植，SMU导师Mandy THAM扶植及TANG Hang Wu扶植ag百家乐稳赢打法，一谈参预并见证了Janet ZHANG同学的毕业答辩。
论文题目
《探索信赖悖论：中国高净值东谈主群对眷属信赖的继承动态》
Janet ZHANG
SJTU-SMU DBA 2020级
杭州信知也管制盘问有限公司首创东谈主兼总老师
1
作家简介：
Janet于2013年创办了Confidel Academy（加拿大），在巨匠限度内寻找专科资源和5P2R处理有绸缪。2018年，Confidel Academy（中国）老师团队将英国海外信赖老练引入中国，共举办31期培训，661东谈主参预老练，通过率为88%。
Janet领有东南大学电气工程学士学位和南京大学商学院硕士学位。复旦海外金融学院EMBA业界导师、MBA《钞票管制》讲师、LICA表情主任兼奉行扶植，绸缪是让学生得到管制个东谈主和业绩钞票所需的常识和妙技。
Janet用功于筹备和涵养。她极端柔柔青少年的海传奇承扶植。同期她还在规画LIC汉文的媒体账户。在舒畅时间，她可爱折纸星星。
2
论文摘录
本筹备筹商了中国高净值个东谈主（HNWIs）对眷属信赖的愚弄不及，尽管其在钞票管制中有着公认的克己。这种表象被称为“信赖悖论”，它凸显了表面上风与内容遴选之间的差距。筹备拜访了阻扰信赖遴选的法律、文化和商场空泛，ag百家乐下三路重心柔柔中国的民法框架、对眷属截止钞票的偏好以及国内信赖行业的不熟练。
遴选了两阶段定量的要害。第一阶段对中国和加拿大的信赖从业者进行拜访，以笃定要害的遴选身分，而第二阶段针对这两个法律证据统率区的中国高净值东谈主士，以考证拜访成果并探索跨境互异。笃定的要害空泛包括中国信赖法中的监管依稀性、对资产截止权录用的文化收敛以及国内信赖行业枯竭专科教育。
该筹备开采了一个整正当律、文化和商场身分的信赖遴选模子，为解析信赖遴选动态提供了一个表面和奉行框架。来自加拿大的相比成见强调了商场熟练度、监管透明度和专科援手在促进信赖使用方面的迫切性。
筹备发现从业者与客户之间存在显贵的感知差距，强调需要明确的监管、专科材干树立以及加强客户扶植。这项筹备为战略制定者和信赖劳动提供商提供了可操作的提议，以处理遴选空泛，使劳动恰当客户需求，并促进眷属信赖算作钞票管制器具的发展。它还通过将法律移植表面和改进扩散模子与新兴商场的推行挑战关系起来，为学术文件作念出了孝敬。
3
导师信息
THAM, Tze Minn Mandy
Dissertation Committee Chair
Full-time Faculty
Associate Professor of Finance (Education); Academic Director, Master of Science in Wealth Management，Lee Kong Chian School of Business
欧阳璨
Co-Supervisor
Full-time Faculty
Associate Professor of Organization Management ACEM, SJTU
TANG Hang Wu
Committee Member(s)
Full-time Faculty
Associate Provost (Research Governance); Professor of Law;
Deputy Institutional Official for SMU's Institutional Review Board
4
Abstract
This study examines the underutilization of family trusts by Chinese high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) despite their recognized benefits in wealth management. Termed the “Trust Paradox,” this phenomenon highlights the gap between theoretical advantages and practical adoption. The research investigates legal, cultural, and market barriers that inhibit trust adoption, focusing on China’s civil law framework, cultural preferences for family-controlled wealth, and the immaturity of the domestic trust industry.
A two-stage quantitative approach was employed. Stage I surveyed trust practitioners in China and Canada to identify critical adoption factors, while Stage II targeted Chinese HNWIs in both jurisdictions to validate findings and explore cross-border differences. Key barriers identified include regulatory ambiguities in China’s Trust Law, cultural resistance to delegating asset control, and a lack of professional expertise within the domestic trust industry.
The study develops a Trust Adoption Model integrating legal, cultural, and market factors, providing a theoretical and practical framework for understanding trust adoption dynamics. Comparative insights from Canada highlight the importance of market maturity, regulatory transparency, and professional support in promoting trust usage.
Findings reveal significant perceptual gaps between practitioners and clients, emphasizing the need for regulatory clarity, professional capacity-building, and enhanced client education. This research offers actionable recommendations for policymakers and trust service providers to address adoption barriers, align services with client needs, and foster the growth of family trusts as a wealth management tool. It also contributes to academic literature by linking legal transplantation theories and innovation diffusion models with real-world challenges in emerging markets.
当今苦求
2025年8月入学口试时间：
第一批：3月25日
第二批：4月18日
第三批：5月14日
盘问电话：021-52301020
阅读更多
管制学海外博士
点赞，点在看，E起同业
